STAM101:: Lecture 16 :: Randomized blocks design – description – layout – analysis – advantages and disadvantages
                  
				
Randomized Blocks Design (RBD)
When the experimental material is heterogeneous, the experimental material is grouped into homogenous sub-groups called blocks. As each block consists of the entire set of treatments a block is equivalent to a replication.
If the fertility gradient runs in one direction say from north to south or east to west then the blocks are formed in the opposite direction. Such an arrangement of grouping the heterogeneous units into homogenous blocks is known as randomized blocks design. Each block consists of as many experimental units as the number of treatments. The treatments are allocated randomly to the experimental units within each block independently such that each treatment occurs once. The number of blocks is chosen to be equal to the number of replications for the treatments.
 The analysis of variance model for RBD is 
				  Yij = m + ti + rj + eij 
				  where
				  m = the overall mean
				  ti  = the ith treatment effect
				  rj  = the jth  replication effect
				  eij = the error term for ith treatment and jth  replication
Analysis of RBD
The results of RBD can be arranged in a two way table according to  the replications (blocks) and treatments. 
				  There will be r x t observations in total where r stands for number  of replications and t for number of treatments. . 
				  The data are arranged in a two way table form by representing  treatments in rows and replications in columns.
Treatment  | 
                    Replication  | 
                    Total  | 
                  ||||
  | 
                    1  | 
                    2  | 
                    3  | 
                    …………  | 
                    r  | 
                    
  | 
                  
1  | 
                    y11  | 
                    y12  | 
                    y13  | 
                    …………  | 
                    y1r  | 
                    T1  | 
                  
2  | 
                    y21  | 
                    y22  | 
                    y23  | 
                    …………  | 
                    y2r  | 
                    T2  | 
                  
3  | 
                    y31  | 
                    y32  | 
                    y33  | 
                    …………  | 
                    y3r  | 
                    T3  | 
                  
t  | 
                    yt1  | 
                    yt2  | 
                    yt3  | 
                    ………….  | 
                    ytr  | 
                    Tt  | 
                  
Total  | 
                    R1  | 
                    R2  | 
                    R3  | 
                    
  | 
                    Rr  | 
                    G.T  | 
                  
In this design the total variance is divided into three sources of  variation viz., between replications, between treatments and error
                    ![]()
				  Total SS=TSS=åå y ij 2  – CF
				  Replication SS=RSS= = 
åRj2 – CF
				  Treatments SS=TrSS = 
åTi2  - CF
				  Error SS=ESS = Total SS – Replication SS – Treatment SS
				  The skeleton ANOVA table for RBD with t treatments and r  replications
Sources of variation  | 
                    d.f.  | 
                    SS  | 
                    MS  | 
                    F Value  | 
                  
Replication   | 
                    r-1  | 
                    RSS  | 
                    RMS  | 
                    RM S/ EM S  | 
                  
Treatment  | 
                    t-1  | 
                    TrSS  | 
                    TrMS  | 
                    TrMS/EMS  | 
                  
Error  | 
                    (r-1) (t-1)  | 
                    ESS  | 
                    EMS  | 
                    
  | 
                  
Total  | 
                    rt –1  | 
                    TSS  | 
                    
  | 
                    
  | 
                  
CD = SE(d) . t    where S.E(d)= ![]()
				  t = critical value of t for a specified level of significance and  error degrees of freedom
				  Based on the CD value the bar chart can be drawn. 
				  From the bar chart conclusion can be written.
Advantages of RBD
				  The precision is more in RBD. The amount of information obtained in  RBD is more as compared to CRD. RBD is more flexible. Statistical analysis is  simple and easy. Even if some values are missing, still the analysis can be  done by using missing plot technique.
Disadvantages of RBD
When the number of treatments is increased, the block size will increase. If the block size is large maintaining homogeneity is difficult and hence when more number of treatments is present this design may not be suitable.
| Download this lecture as PDF here |